Talk:Submarine Internet Cables - By Pablo Latorre: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
this way very enlightening! With the task of suggesting an improvement, I might question whether UNCLOS may be construed as an institution (although I agree it is a governance tool). - Ceren | this way very enlightening! With the task of suggesting an improvement, I might question whether UNCLOS may be construed as an institution (although I agree it is a governance tool). - Ceren | ||
This was a very interesting topic. I found the difference between the ICPC and the US FCC particularly interesting because, where ICPC relies on voluntary industry guidelines, the FCC can use its own regulatory power to deny cable licenses based on national security concerns and whether the are US 'adversaries'. I think it was good to highlight that the US never ratified the UNCLOS treaty, which allows it to use "national interest" concerns more broadly to create differences in submarine cable regulations based on the country it is contracting with. Great entry! - Sisi | |||
Latest revision as of 11:19, 23 September 2026
this way very enlightening! With the task of suggesting an improvement, I might question whether UNCLOS may be construed as an institution (although I agree it is a governance tool). - Ceren
This was a very interesting topic. I found the difference between the ICPC and the US FCC particularly interesting because, where ICPC relies on voluntary industry guidelines, the FCC can use its own regulatory power to deny cable licenses based on national security concerns and whether the are US 'adversaries'. I think it was good to highlight that the US never ratified the UNCLOS treaty, which allows it to use "national interest" concerns more broadly to create differences in submarine cable regulations based on the country it is contracting with. Great entry! - Sisi