Talk:Decentralized digital currency: BITCOIN (Sisi): Difference between revisions

From Technology Governance Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
← Older edit

Latorre Tallard Pablo (talk | contribs)

96 edits
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
Line 2: Line 2:




 
Bitcoin could be one of the most interesting cases for analysis. Bitcoin was designed to not have a centralized governance and this presents a very complex question: can Bitcoin be governed? And by this I mean not the surrounding interface or ecosystem of Bitcoin (exchanges, wallets, etc.) but Bitcoin itself. From the regulator perspective the question is almost ontological: if the proposed regulation fails it may be not because the regulation was imperfect or insufficient, but because Bitcoin presents a structural resistance to regulation that would make every regulation fail. Also, from Winner's perspective Bitcoin seems to have an internal political vision (distrust from governments and central banks): this makes me question if trying to regulate Bitcoin is not only a technical-regulatory challenge but also an ideological one. Thanks for the entrance, it is a really cool topic. Pablo.
Very interesting to see this evaluation of a notoriously non-governed instrument! A suggestion could be to mention talks of regulating cryptocurrency in some countries? - Ceren
From the governance perspective, Bitcoin could be one of the most interesting cases for analysis. Bitcoin was designed to not have a centralized governance and this presents a very complex question: can Bitcoin be governed? And by this I mean not the surrounding interface or ecosystem of Bitcoin (exchanges, wallets, etc.) but Bitcoin itself. From the regulator perspective the question is almost ontological: if the proposed regulation fails it may be not because the regulation was imperfect or insufficient, but because Bitcoin presents a structural resistance to regulation that would make every regulation fail. Also, from Winner's perspective Bitcoin seems to have an internal political vision (distrust from governments and central banks): this makes me question if trying to regulate Bitcoin is not only a technical-regulatory challenge but also an ideological one. Thanks for the entrance, it is a really cool topic. Pablo.

Latest revision as of 23:14, 22 September 2026

Very interesting to see this evaluation of a notoriously non-governed instrument! A suggestion could be to mention talks of regulating cryptocurrency in some countries? - Ceren


Bitcoin could be one of the most interesting cases for analysis. Bitcoin was designed to not have a centralized governance and this presents a very complex question: can Bitcoin be governed? And by this I mean not the surrounding interface or ecosystem of Bitcoin (exchanges, wallets, etc.) but Bitcoin itself. From the regulator perspective the question is almost ontological: if the proposed regulation fails it may be not because the regulation was imperfect or insufficient, but because Bitcoin presents a structural resistance to regulation that would make every regulation fail. Also, from Winner's perspective Bitcoin seems to have an internal political vision (distrust from governments and central banks): this makes me question if trying to regulate Bitcoin is not only a technical-regulatory challenge but also an ideological one. Thanks for the entrance, it is a really cool topic. Pablo.

Retrieved from "https://wiki.ivir.nl/index.php?title=Talk:Decentralized_digital_currency:_BITCOIN_(Sisi)&oldid=123892"